Bad: I had a paycheck for two days of work coming to me from working at Slesnicks, one of Snelling's contracts. I had called in the night before and told Snelling that I would not be into work the next day at Slesnicks. I expected to receive a check the next week for the two days worked but did not. Today I called and inquired about the check. According to Slenicks, they did not have any proof of me working the Monday and Tuesday that I should have been paid for but Snelling has the recorded message of me. Improvements: calling in Tuesday night saying that I would not be returning Weds. to work at Slenicks. Now if I had not worked the Monday or Tuesday that I had worked then I would have informed the staff Friday that I would not be returning to Slenicks on Monday. Also if I would not have worked the Monday or Tuesday then Slenicks would have called in another temporary from Snelling to replace me, but since I had worked at Slenicks Monday and Tuesday then there was no need to call anyone in, so. This report is not so much. Other: about Snelling as they have all of the data necessary relating to the facts of me working and not being replaced until Weds but more so about Slenicks and the lower level management that does not even have the ability to operate an office professionally but will try and cheat someone out of their money anyway they can. So how can Slenicks say that they had no proof of me working the Monday and Tuesday in question when all of the proof of me working that Monday and Tuesday is recorded on tape and on paper?.
more