Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Car Stereo Shoppe
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
After getting tint done I noticed scratches on the way home. I called and asked if I should immediately bring it back. After redoing the tint there were still scratches. After pointing them out Scott got upset that I was being too picky and insisted he would give me a refund and take the tint off. Upon taking the tint off, the defrosters were broken by the razor used to take the tint off. When the employee was asked, he insisted that he told Scott it would damage the defrosters, and Scott told him to do it anyway. We were not informed the defrosters would be broken upon removal. The upholstery was also gouged by the razor. Scott refuses to pay for the damages caused by his work. He claims that we are at fault for asking for the tint to be removed. We were not notified that there would be damages, AND it wouldn t have had to be removed if the job was done right the first time.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|