Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Banfield
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
Stay away from this place. Even by looking up other reviews online you should know that this place is terrible. This place is only after your money and practice best practices for the Vet's pocket not yours. I unfortunately let an inexperienced member of our family take our dogs to this vet and $1000 later regret this incident, and will forever. They did not even address the issue at hand instead they came up with a wellness plan that any other sensible vet would laugh at. \r
Two extortion examples: Charging $120 for an injectible antibiotic for a cut that was supposedly infected ( no proof since the dog was taken into the back), which had it been infected could have been taken care of with washing and a topical and oral antibiotic. ($20 vs $ 120 which would you chose?). Charging for ear swabs and claiming that there were ear infections when my vet who examined them later, said there was no ear infection. \r
Their fees are ludicrous and not at all "affordable". When I refused to pay for
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|