Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Grapevine Pediatric Clinic
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
Our experience left much to be desired. On our third appointment, I heard him talking to his nurse in the next room about our place of residence and the diagnosis he was going to give my son before he examined him or even asked me further questions! He kept reitterating how my husband would need a second job to afford the formula he suggested. We didn't even need my son to be on that formula! Incorrect diagnosis and bias based on the fact that we didn't live directly in the prominent community in which he practices. Social stature should have little to do with the treatment you receive. Dr. Scott is in the same practice, and he is more the ideal doctor. He is very up to date with current research and does not blanket diagnose or degrade. The nurses are overall very rude and the front staff is very unfriendly.
Pros: Can't think of any.
Cons: Biased, judgemental, not as knowledgeable as other doctors
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|