Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Northside Veterinary Clinic
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
Our dog had a lump on his elbow that turned out to be cancerous. \r
\r
Our experience at Northside was trecherous. I relayed our dog's medical history to Dr. Eisner who, quite obviously, chose not to listen to me, and instead ran a whole battery of tests (read: expensive) that were off-target. Ultimately the problem was in the realm of what I initially discussed. \r
\r
Dr. Eisner, after discovering the cancer (and after reading a whole host of bacteria-related tests that were totally unnecessary), proceeded to warn me that it looked like Osteosarcoma: an extremely aggressive cancer that would have given my dog a couple of months to live. \r
\r
In short, both vets EIsner and Lehman proved to be wildly unhelpful. They were alarmists who laundry listed cancers before a diagnosis was even confirmed. I ultimately had to run all developments past my former vet back in Los Angeles. \r
\r
My husband and I were bowled over by the lack of professional judgment. It borderlined on unethical behavior. At the very least it was wildly irresponsible. \r
\r
I strongly advise any reader to take their animals elsewhere. While they seemed to be dog-lovers, the compliments stop there.
Pros: dog-lovers
Cons: alarmists, expensive, unprofessional
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|