Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
CAMCO
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
I've had CAMCO Nevada as the HOA for my community for a few years now, and as a long distance property owner, I have not had great experiences with them. As much as I would like to agree that HOAs in general have some importance in regards to ensuring the neighborhood and keeping the properties in the community in decent condition as possible, one would also agree that HOAs have to be reasonable and worth the cost. My experience with CAMCO has been otherwise. Violation warnings are issued and sent with little to no regard on how long it takes long distance owners to assess the situation and implement a solution through their management/tenants. Written description of violations are vague and almost subjective. And no photos are collected to clearly identify the violation so that it can be quickly and efficiently corrected the first time. First time violations are considered ""warnings"" however, not knowing for sure that your first-time-fix was enough to satisfy the HOA, a second violation is sent, instead of, ""sorry, it wasn't good enough the first time"" or ""that's not the violation issue that I vaguely meant"". And all of this ""great policing"" justifies a 30% increase in monthly dues??! Did they not realize that homeowners especially in the state of NV, got hit the most by the bad economy?
These experiences include not only myself but also other home owners in the same community.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|