Las Manitas serves up an appetizing looking plate of Migas, well at least in terms of the Migas part of that plate, which only actually accounts for about 40% of the plate and the plate wasn?t even all that large (with the tortillas on the side). The vast majority of the Las Manitas plate of Migas was occupied by refried beans, which I did not eat (important note: this was because the beans were not vegetarian. The Migas themselves had the familiar look of a pile of Migas that were going to be alright, but not much more than alright. The Migas were the standard foundation of eggs and tortilla chips with a thin layer of cheddar cheese that hadn?t really melted, smothered in ranchero sauce. If there was a veggie in the Las Manitas? Migas I sure didn?t find it (maybe they were hiding under the beans). The menu states, in its description of the Migas that the dish contains two eggs, and that right there is the problem: there were not enough eggs in the Las Manitas? Migas, and this attributes to most of the Migas? problems. The tortilla chips were there and they were pretty crunchy, okay they were very crunchy, perhaps a bit too crunchy, and the problem with this is mainly that the egg to tortilla ratio was not sufficient. While the cheese layer was thin and had barely melted, so that by the time I got to the lower layers of Migas they were lacking completely of cheese . The ranchero sauce was pretty good, and there was plenty of it, and as there was salsa on the table I can?t criticize them for being un-saucy, and I?ve got to say the tortillas were darn good. I understand that many people like beans with their breakfast these beans kind of ruined much of the Migas actually touching them. If the Las Manitas Migas had 1 more egg, and an increase in the cheese to reflect that, the Migas would have probably been quite a bit better?and in all likelihood they also would have taken up more than 40% of the plate. \r
More Migas reviews at www.themelbournemethod.blogspot dot com
more