Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage you to read through our Terms of Use before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions, but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating, and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms of Use, please complete the following short form.

Businiess name:  Animal Shelter Victor Valley Protective League Inc
Review by:  WENDY V.
Review content: 
I GUESS I LIVED MY WHOLE LIFE THINKING THAT A SHELTER WAS LIKE A MEDICAL FACILITY. DOGS AND CATS WERE TAKEN CARE OF PROPERLY UNTIL EITHER THEY WERE ADOPTED, TAKEN HOME BY THEIR OWNER, OR SADLY PUT TO SLEEP. BOY, WAS I WRONG! MY SON AND I VISITED THE ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE ON SATURDAY LOOKING FOR A FAMILY PET AND COMPANION. DOES "NON PROFIT"MEAN THAT IT IS OKAY FOR THERE TO BE 3 TO 6 DOGS PER KENNEL, FREEZING, ALL WITH DIAHREA, AND COVERED IN ITS OWN FECES, SO MUCH THEY HAD TO WALK THROUGH IT. THAT IS , IF THEY DARED TO LEAVE THE HUDDLE THEY WERE IN TO TRY AND KEEP FROM FREEZING TO DEATH. IT WAS 31 DEGREES OUTSIDE. MAYBE I AM NIEVE, BUT I AM HAVING A HARD TIME FINDING ANY JUSTIFICATION FOR THE CRUELTY. THE DOGS WOULD BE BETTER OFF DEAD. THE SHELTER ONLY SERVES TO PUT THE NAIL IN THE COFFIN WITH THE PUBLIC WHO SEEKS TO ADOPT.BECAUSE IT IS OBVIOUS, THERE WOULD BE THE FURTHER EXPENSE OF A VETERNARIAN .FROM MY PROSPECTIVE, THIS SHELTER IS SABATOGING ANIMAL LIFE. IF I AM WRONG, AND THIS CAN BE JUSTIFIDE, PLEASE ENLIGHTEN ME.

Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
 or  Cancel