Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Veterinary Specialty Hospital
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
Our regular vet referred us to this hospital for an imaging test for our pet. The hospital vet insisted it was necessary to admit our pet for “monitoring,” and our pet declined rapidly from there. The hospital vets handling our case didn’t diagnose the correct condition quickly enough. Our pet was placed in the hospital’s ICU area, which is a highly stressful environment (too bright, too noisy, and too chaotic). The ICU at this particular hospital should not be a “holding area” for a sick animal whose medical condition will be greatly impacted by stress.
We had to have our pet euthanized after two highly stressful days of invasive procedures, contradictory treatment protocols, and one insensitive hospital vet who kept minimizing our pet’s stress level. Also, the hospital staff was not keeping our regular vet informed of daily medical decisions (our regular vet wasn’t notified again by the hospital until three days after our pet was euthanized). Additional invasive and expensive diagnostic tests were recommended, but it was very clear to us that our pet was distressed and suddenly dying. We believe that our pet suffered needlessly during his short stay at this hospital. It is probably very effective as a trauma center, but use extreme caution if your pet is being admitted for conditions other than trauma/emergency triage.
Pros: 24-hour availability; good for "trauma" cases
Cons: Sub-par diagnostic skills; expensive services
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|