Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Shulman Hodges & Bastian LLP
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
Santa Ana Federal Court Judge Albert denies and Disgorges fees from the Law Office of Shulman, Bastian & Hodges. The Judge cited he wanted to send a clear message to the public and legal community for work billed that had no value for the BK reorganization. The consensus from the US Trustee, Trustee and Judge Albert concluded that SHB had fundamentally failed the estate. The Fees disallowed by Judge Albert was excessive of $216,000. What was most appalling as a client was the discovery that SBH placed its own interest ahead of its client to do the right things and own its mistakes. For months they had kept me from finding that their incompetence and potential Malpractice, and major violations with the court were the catalyst for losing DIP status. It's incredible to think that Len Shulman and Mark Bradshaw were perfectly fine with the quality of work that nearly cost me over $3,000,000 in lifetime of savings and sat silently while the court Appointed Trustee tried to quickly liquidate my properties. I'm grateful that Judge Albert realized that ethics and the rules are more important than the reputation a Law firm and that evidence is the corner stone of our legal system in America.\r
\r
I am happy to report that the Malpractice case is moving forward and that the State Bar is investigating Len Shulman, Mark Bradshaw and the firm. Recently evidence was discovered that Len Shulman and Mark Bradshaw lied to Judge Albert. Formal charges appear to be eminent.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|