Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Halboth Mark J DDS
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
Halboth diagnosed that a 2010 crown provided by the patient?s previous dentist did not cover the tooth and that the tooth would ?rotted out? within a few years. When the patient indicated that Delta only covered a new crown every 5 years, Halboth said ?you won?t have a tooth in 5 years.? Halboth recommended immediate replacement by himself. The patient submitted the case to peer review and met with three MDA peer review dentists, which after examining the crown and X-ray, concluded that the crown was sound. Halboth?s office never verified the benefits available under the patient?s insurance plan and began taking numerous sets of x-rays. Insurance did not pay for the 1 every 5 years and patient was billed. When the patient offered to pay for half of the X-ray, she was informed that she's lucky not to have been billed $35 for the copy sent to peer review. The office also threatened to take the patient to small claims court even though the patient never said that she was not going to pay the bill.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|