Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
St. Marks Veterinary Hospital
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
When I got my first dog a friend recommended St Mark's so maybe at one time they were good, but not in my experience. In retrospect (and after having found a great vet since), I actually feel preyed upon by them. Constantly ordering tests that weren?t needed (and even the good reviews admit St Marks is very expensive) - I literally could not get out of this place without a ballooning bill. Some of it was my inexperience being a novice dog owner and thinking everything they suggested was necessary, but that almost makes it worse in my opinion. Examples include a biopsy on a bump (on the suture from his neuter) my current vet said he never would have looked twice at, a heartworm test as part of a ""routine"" checkup when my dog was on medication and had tested negative on his initial visit eight months earlier(!), and his neuter. The neuter estimate was jawdropping. When I balked, they then admitted some of the services included were optional ? two different painkillers for example. I asked if one of those could possibly go the response was a guilt-inducing - ""but you wouldn't want to put your dog through pain would you?"" The catheter? What if my dog is a hemophiliac and bleeds to death before they can put one in? I finally pushed back and pared the services down (cruel dog owner that I am) but still paid over $500. Left there ever time with an uneasy feeling I'd just been swindled.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|