Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage you to read through our Terms of Use before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions, but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating, and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms of Use, please complete the following short form.

Businiess name:  Banning Veterinary Hospital
Review by:  citysearch c.
Review content: 
BEWARE: ""Teeth Cleaning"" I took my pet dog in for an examination about a 3 weeks ago, and during the course of the exam, the vet found ONE (1) front tooth to be slightly wobbly, and he indicated that all of her other teeth were fine, but recommended that she have her teeth cleaned, and indicated that the wobbly tooth might have to be removed. Consequently, I made an appt for a week later to have her teeth cleaned. The quoted fee was $180, and because I am not working, I felt that $200 would be my absolute limit. When I arrived with my dog, I had to sign an authorization that gave the vet the right to extract whatever teeth he determined should be removed. In retrospect, this form is there for a reason, specifically, that Banning Veterinary has had prior problems (legal I assume) as a consequence of being overly aggressive in tooth extraction. I also asked to speak with the vet before I let my dog go, but all I got was an assistant, who I again explained my employment situation to, and what my expectations were for this visit. When I returned to pick up my dog, I was informed that they had removed nine (thats right, 9 !! ) teeth. That is about 25% of all of her teeth. She is also an older dog. I was LIVID, but powerless to turn back the clock on what had just been done to her. As I was checking out, ANOTHER owner was picking up his dog, and his dog ALSO had nine (9) teeth removed. (BTW: 9 teeth = $100 extra in charges.) THE BILL: Was OVER 200% of what I had been told, or TWICE what I couldn't afford. WORSE: My dog was heavily drugged, and in obvious pain. Remember, she is over 70 dog years old. So the lessons that I now have seared into my mind, and the recommendations I am suggesting anyone follow, regardless of where you may consider having this done. However, I would ABSOLUTELY adhere to the following at Banning Veterinary. 1) Speak to the vet that will perform the

Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
 or  Cancel