Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Sono Bello Bellevue
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
I'm a veteran of two liposuction events, one conventional 15 years ago and Sono Bello one year ago. The conventional liposuction was done under full anesthesia and removed the fat more effectively than the Sono Bello proceedure. In spite of the full anesthesia the conventional was more painful afterwards and also resulted in more bleeding and bruising. But, it wasn't that bad. The one good thing about the Sono Bello procedure was that, for me, there was no pain and bruising. The bad thing about Sono Bello is that it didn't do the job. I still have fat to be removed, that was supposed to be remove and was not. Originally, I was told that what I wanted removed would have to be done in two sessions but later the doctor decided that it could be done in just one session. Well, I was for having just one session if it was true but, it wasn't. Six months after the procedure I complained to Sono Bello that the job wasn't done. Instead of offering to go back in and finish the job, I was told that it was the fault of my skin, that I was too old. Well, I was the same age when they took my money so I don't think that's a very good excuse. My guess is that it would have gone better if it had been done in two sessions instead of one but it wouldn't have been as profitable for Sono Bello. Over all I can say that there was some improvement but for $8,000+ I am disappointed.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|