Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Detroit Dover Animal Hospital
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
I took my dog to the Detroit Dover Animal Hospital from when it was a puppy until it was about three years old. Most of the time I brought her in they used the "wait and see" approach and would tell me to monitor her and bring her back if the symptoms continued. Every time I brought the dog back for the same issue they would charge an additional exam fee. They prescribed medicine that gave here a bad skin rash and then prescribed the same medicine at a later date claiming they did not have record of her allergy to the medicine. My dog developed a small cyst that the vet thought was the result of the ID microchip they implanted in her neck. They waited until it was infected to do anything about it and at that point it required surgery. They claimed it would be of no cost to me because it was due to the ID microchip they implanted. When I went to pick up the dog after the sergery they changed their mind and demanded payment for the surgery and would not give my dog back until I pai
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|