Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Chelsea Restaurant
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
My husband and I got engaged on the Queen Mary a year ago, and to celebrate our anniversary we decided to try (the supposedly more reasonable restaurant) ""The Chelsea"" instead of ""Sir Winston's"".\r
\r
The seafood appetizer for two was over $30 dollars, (like most of the Entrees) and the shrimp tasted very fishy (i.e. not fresh at all) and the crab claws looked like they came from a baby crustacean and had no flavor. The Caviar was pretty good, but...how can you mess up imported caviar from a can?\r
\r
Thank GOD we decided to split an entree, because if we had paid for 2 we would've felt like we were robbed twice...the Paella was CLEARLY out of a box...instead of the strong saffron taste you usually expect w/this dish, instead I think it was just yellow colored pilaf of some sort. The chunks of chicken were extremely dry (I suspect cooked far, far in advance) and the seafood was overcooked, stiff, fishy and obviously re-heated from frozen. \r
\r
Finally, we decided to take a chance on what appeared to be a decadent chocolate dessert. It took FOREVER to come out of the kitchen, almost to the point where my husband and I joked it must have been due to the extravagant syrup design on the plate-but then when we bit into it, it had the consistency of a hockey puck --- we realized that this too was defrosted from frozen, and tasted like a hunk of Betty Crocker style ""ready to spread"" frosting (except so cold, it wasn't even ready to eat). \r
\r
Now, just for the record, I have NEVER been motivated to write a review on Citysearch, I thought that was for people w/not enough to do...but this TERRIBLE meal inspired us!\r
\r
I LOVE the Queen Mary but I hope the owners & management realize this beautiful landmark will NOT survive w/out an improvement in this restaurant's (and other areas of the ship) decor, service and cuisine! Gordon Ramsey where are you when we need you???
Pros: on the ship-but Ambience terrible
Cons: Awful Food @ High Prices
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|