Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage you to read through our Terms of Use before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions, but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating, and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms of Use, please complete the following short form.

Businiess name:  Animal Trustees of Austin
Review by:  Guest
Review content: 
We brought in two young feline siblings for their spays in December 2009. They didn't use stitches; they used surgical glue. Both incisions opened two or three days after the surgeries, at different times. The first kitten we took back to the ATA have the incision re-checked and re-closed. The doctor literally stepped out of surgery, *stapled* her belly closed, with no topical anesthetic and no sedation of any kind, and sent her back out to the waiting room, all inside 5 minutes. They treated her like a number, not like a living thing. She was in terrible pain for 36 hours; she would not eat or drink anything, and couldn't be touched. A day later, the other kitten's incision opened in the same way. This time we took her directly to our neighborhood vet; we weren't about to put her through the same horrible experience as her sister. After relaying the story, our vet was appalled that the ATA had used staples at all, much less without any anesthetic, and said it was "backwards and barbaric". All told, we spent over $300 fixing what should have only cost about $80 to begin with. As much as I admire what the ATA is trying to do for the community, I will NEVER take an animal there again, for any reason. It was horrifying the way they just didn't care. We even sent a detailed letter to the ATA about the incident. We haven't heard anything back from them and don't expect we will.

Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
 or  Cancel