Sign in or  Join Judy's Book to contribute
Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage you to read through our Terms of Use before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be contents on Judy's Book that is personal in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions, but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating, and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms of Use, please complete the following short form.
Businiess name:  Seattle Times
Review by:  shermanator g.
Review content: 
I've always wanted to review a Newspaper. I mean they have so much to say about everything, and apart from the Letters to the Editor that nobody reads, when do we get our say? In Seattle, we have two daily newspapers: The Seattle Times and the Seattle Post Intelligencer (PI). If you're looking for a good blend of local news and national/international news, the Times is a good fit. The PI focuses mainly just on local news with a mild attempt at news beyond Seattle. I give the Seattle Times 4 stars for a newspaper. It's no 5 stars (New York Times, LA Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post), and it's no 2 stars (Portland Oregonian). The Times is a family owned long-time Seattle newspaper that really does a good job of bringing Seattle together around its local issues, and how it fits into the rest of the world. The Times' strengths are its depth of local community interest and up-to-date action stories, plus they cover national & international news with their own beats, and really work to get the right international stories in the blend. In addition, their weekly Weekend datebook section is great for planning family activities and seeing what's happening with music, art, and the performing arts. The weakest part of the Seattle Times is its Business Section, which most days of the week seems to be at least 60% Microsoft & Boeing coverage. You do get the feeling sometimes that the Redmond giant has a direct line into the business editors desk. They really need to diversify there. In addition, in the front & local sections, their Seattle political coverage is a little on the weak side--they don't expose the fun insides of Seattle politics too much. The Times editorial staff seems to always be open to changing the format, layout, and focus of its sections and writer's beats. I actually read the Managing Editor's article every week to get a sense of the many new things they're doing. In addition, the paper does really good in-depth local investigative reporting that often ends up in government stepping up to solve the problem highlighted! If you're going to subscribe to a daily newspaper in town, I recommend the Times. If you do want, however, the top tier of world and business stories, you'll have to subscribe as well to one of the 5 star papers I mention above. I enjoy reading the Times every day.

Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
 or  Cancel