Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Gwen Luce
|
|
Review by:
David B.
|
|
Review content:
I was the buyer and Gwen represented the seller in a real estate transaction for a house Palo Alto. The deal was not a straight-forward deal and Gwen had made some special arrangements with a second lien holder in order to get the house on the market at a fair market price. Something went wrong and in the last 5 days of the 45 day escrow, Gwen (and my agent) proposed that I kick in an addition sum of money to make the deal complete. I think it had something to do with the agents getting squeezed on their commissions by the second lien holder. Anyway, this was totally inappropriate since I was not a party to the arrangement between Gwen and the second lien holder -- and besides which we had long since removed all contingencies on the deal. Gwen is a nice lady and I'm sure she meant well, but I wouldn't trust her to have a client's best interests in mind.
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|