Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Zanesville Joint & Clutch
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
I had a new driveshaft built for me by Zanesville Joint and Clutch. The driveshaft failed as soon as I reached 55 mph on the highway. I called the company and was told it was the operators fault, and the warranty about faulty parts and defective material on the reciept is no good.I then contacted the Attorney Generals office and the Better Business Beauro and expalined my problem. And received letters from Zanesville Joint and Clutch via the AGO and BBB giving me numerous excuses. Examples:1. Driveshafts are intended to fail.2. Under normal use that driveshaft would operate fine for many years.3. The operator knew of the implications of the driveshaft that was built for him.4. They were not given enough information to make a proper driveshaft for his vehicle.5. They believe the rear differential failed and caused the driveshaft to fail.6. The operator would have to be driving faster than 78 mph for the driveshaft to fail.7. I don't believe 78 mph to be a safe speed.8. The critical spee
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|