Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage you to read through our Terms of Use before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions, but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating, and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms of Use, please complete the following short form.

Businiess name:  Amy's Alterations
Review by:  citysearch c.
Review content: 
1) Used salmon color thread on my pink shirt. It's a very common pink and I saw they \r have exactly the same color thread. They were just too lazy to change from the last \r piece of work, or they were lack of the rigorous attitude to match the thread. \r 2) Very arrogant and wouldn't listen to your request. Their response is like ""We've \r been doing this for years, we know how to do it"". 3) When I pointed out that the two \r sleeves of my jacket look different, they responded as ""Nobody would find out unless \r people stand very close to you"". Outside is just ok, but the reverse side of the clothes \r are a total mess. Their standard is at the level of ""look like"", ""seem like"", ""almost"" or \r ""nearly"". They have no concept of rigorous or precision. I understand that the clothes\r can not look exactly the same after alteration, but there are a lot that they can do to \r improve their work, like matching the color of the thread. I didn't expect that the two \r sleeves can look the same as if no alteration, but at least the two sleeves should look the same \r as each other. Pros: Very quick Cons: Poor quality

Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
 or  Cancel