Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Board Of Prison Terms
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
THIS WEEK MY BOYFRIEND MARK MARTINEZ OF STOCKTON WENT TO COURT ON FALSE CHARGES THAT I MADE CAUSE I WAS UPSET AT HIM AND IAM HAVING A BABY BY HIM. ALL CHARGES WAS DISMISSED IN COURT ON MONDAY AND THE DA REJECTED THE FILE ON FRIDAY WHICH IF THE PAROLE AGENTS KEPT UP WITH THEIR PAROLEES THEY WOULD KNOW WHEN THEY VIOLATED THEM EXACTLY WHAT WAS GOING ON ON THE VIOLATION AND STOCKTON PAROLE OFFICE WENT AHEAD AND SENT MY BOYFRIEND TO DVI FOR A BOARD HEARING HE IS INOCENT AND DOSENT DESERVE THIS TREATMENT . ONCE THE CHARGES WASNT PICKUP BY SANJOAQUIN DISTRICT ATTORNEY THEN PAROLE SHOULD OF LET HIM GO INSTEAD THEY PICKED UP THE VIOLATION AND ARE COSTING THE STATE MONEY THAT IT DOSENT HAVE TO HAVE A BOARD HEARING CAUSE THEY STATED PAPERWORK WAS FILED THE MORNING BEFORE COURT . THAT IS THE MOST STRUPID THING IVE EVER HEARD WHY WOULD THEY DO PAPERWORK BEFORE THE COURT HEARING AND NOT WAIT FOR AT LEAST HE FIRST COURT APPEARENCE ? I AM GOING TO PICKET THE STOCKTON PAROLE OFFICE IF MY BOYFRIEND IS NOT FREED OF THES STUPID RULE THAT THEY MAKE UP AS THEY GO IN STOCKTON.
Pros: RELEASE INMATES WHEN CHARGES ARE DISMISSED
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|