Report a problem
Judy's Book takes violations of our Terms of Use very seriously. We encourage
you to read through our
Terms of Use
before filling report with us.
After careful review, we may remove content or replace a content warning page before
viewing content deemed offensive, harmful, or dangerous.
Additionally, we are aware that there may be content on Judy's Book that is personal
in nature or feels invasive. Please note that Judy's Book is a provider of content
creation tools, not a mediator of content. We allow our users express their opinions,
but we don't make any claims about the content of these pages. We strongly believe
in freedom of expression, even if a review contains unappealing or distasteful
content or present negative viewpoints. We realize that this may be frustrating,
and we regret any inconvenience this may cause you. In cases where contact information
for the author is listed on the page, we recommend that you work directly with this
person to have the content in question removed or changed.
Here are some examples of content we will not remove unless provided with a court
order:
Personal attacks or alleged defamation
Political or social commentary
Distasteful imagery or language
If we've read the Terms of Use and believe that this review below violates our Terms
of Use, please complete the following short form.
|
Businiess name:
Pompetti Heating & Air Conditioning
|
|
Review by:
citysearch c.
|
|
Review content:
We hired Jim Pompetti to do an assessment of our steam heat system for $350. The written report he produced was not so much an assessment as an itemized estimate for what it would cost for him to do the work he felt was necessary. It provided only vague information about the problems with our system, with items such as, ""Correct piping,"" and ""poor insulation"" without any additional explanation or specifics. After I called and left a message that I wanted to speak with him because I was not satisfied with the written report, he came to our house unannounced to refund our money because it was inconceivable to him that his report could be unsatisfactory. I convinced him to sit down and talk with me so I could explain why I was not satisfied with the report, and when I explained that the report was lacking in specific information, he quipped that what I wanted was ""fluff,"" and insulted me and my profession by stating that, because I am an attorney, I ""write fluff.""
|
Reasons for reporting (512 characters left):
|
|
Reasons are required.
|
|
or
Cancel
|