\r
Dr. Spencer, the new owner, refused to see my dying cat because I saw another vet. I consider this professional misconduct.\r
\r
It was the previous vet-owner, Dr. Stephen Jones, who built up the reputation of this clinic. \r
\r
Spencer misdiagnosed speckling on my cat's nose as precancerous lesions based on a nonchalant two-second examination, handed us the estimate, and let us know he was ready to do surgery. \r
\r
He generously told me that he could clean my cat's teeth and remove the lesion at the same time, provided that I submit the cat to an ultrasound cardiac screening ($500). He did not explain the risks involved in such surgery on a geriatric cat.\r
\r
He examined my for a total of two minutes and showed no genuine interest in my cat. His approach can be described as ""shooting-from-the-hip.""\r
\r
He summarized the first office visit by saying that my cat was in terrible shape. The next day, however, after he actually looked at the lab results, he reversed himself. Then he stated that I could stop--cold-turkey-- the sub-cutaneous injections. This is advice that I strongly believe, in retrospect, harmed my cat and led to his premature death.\r
\r
His expertise on felines is frankly nil. Claiming that a cat with chronic renal failure, just based on numbers, is back in a ""pre-crash"" phase flew in the face of common sense--kidney function does not regenerate--and was misleading. \r
\r
I should have known better when, before deciding whether to go here or not, I interviewed the vet tech. We were suddenly pulled out of the room by a staff person who gave me a dirty look and had me presented with a bill for $40 (no one had even seen my cat!).\r
\r
One positive note: they do write prescriptions so you don't have to feel ripped off buying medications from their limited dispensary (cf, Cat Clinic of Seattle).\r
\r
Not a good place to bring a cat, in any case. \r
\r
\r
Pros: Write prescriptions upon request
Cons: Incompetence, Unprofessionalism, Gossipy
more